Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Historic sites
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Could someone please reassess the above article ? Thanks Anthere (talk)
I would like to use the Historic Site infobox for articles on the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) and so I need a designation. I believe this register meets all the criteria:
- It is a register that exists under legislation of South Africa as the National Heritage Resources Act, number 25 of 1999
- The article South African Heritage Resources Agency has existed for some time on Wikipedia
- Its scope is of National importance and currently has 1720+/- entries (and will continue to grow slowly over time)
- The text should be "South African Heritage Resources Agency" (which is its official name and is unambiguous). If it needed to be shorter, the acronym "SAHRA" could be used. The national colours of South Africa are Green and Gold and as World Heritage Sites are indicated by Yellow/gold it would be preferable for the South African Register to be a dark Green colour.
- Hundreds of pages already exist from the SAHRA registry and I would like to make more over time.
Thank you, User:SpringbokSam 27 March 2017
Nominating Palais Rohan, Strasbourg, for A-Class (this time without interference)
[edit]The article failed its FAC, but it was much expanded and edited in the process since it became a GA, and actually got some support: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Palais Rohan, Strasbourg/archive1. It most probably fulfils all the criteria to be promoted A-Class. Thank you in advance to all future reviewers! --Edelseider (talk) 10:13 pm, Today (UTC+2)
Revise designation for the New South Wales State Heritage Register
[edit]@Aguyintobooks:@Kerry Raymond:@The Drover's Wife: A revision of the exiting designation for the New South Wales State Heritage Register is proposed. The Register currently lists items of international, national, State, and local heritage. As a result, the existing designation structure on Wikipedia does not allow the reader to distinguish if a heritage item is of local or state significance. It is proposed that seperate codes be established, as follows:
- Code for {{Designation/colour}}
|NEW SOUTH WALES STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW|NSW SHR = #DACAA5 |NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE DATABASE|NSW HERITAGE DATABASE|NSWHD|NSW HD = #A8BDEC
- Code for {{Designation/text}}
|NEW SOUTH WALES STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW|NSW SHR = New South Wales State Heritage Register |NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE DATABASE|NSW HERITAGE DATABASE|NSWHD|NSW HD = New South Wales Heritage (Local) Register
- Code for {{Designation/colour2}}
|NEW SOUTH WALES STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW STATE HERITAGE REGISTER|NSW|NSW SHR = #DACAA5 |NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE DATABASE|NSW HERITAGE DATABASE|NSWHD|NSW HD = #A8BDEC
- Explanatory notes for inclusion in Template:Designation/doc and Template:Designation/Supported designations
{{designation/Supported designations/row|t={{{t|}}}|New South Wales State Heritage Register|[[Australia]]|~2000|NEW SOUTH WALES STATE HERITAGE REGISTER; NSW STATE HERITAGE REGISTER; NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE REGISTER; NSW HERITAGE REGISTER; NSW; NSW SHR}}
{{designation/Supported designations/row|t={{{t|}}}|New South Wales Heritage Database|[[Australia]]|???|NEW SOUTH WALES HERITAGE DATABASE; NSW HERITAGE DATABASE; NSWHD; NSW HD}}
Montacute House
[edit]There are discussions at Talk:Montacute House about image placement and infobox format which would benefit from editor input. Thank you, A.D.Hope (talk) 20:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
China Designations
[edit]Strange that there aren't any supported designations for China considering its importance in human cultural heritage. Here are a few designations I think should be added.
- Major Historical and Cultural Sites Protected at the National Level
- Historical and Cultural Sites Protected at the Provincial Level
- Historical and Cultural Sites Protected at the Level of a City Divided into Districts or at the Level of an Autonomous Prefecture
- Historical and Cultural Sites Protected at the County Level
These are all under adminstration of the National Cultural Heritage Administration, and all have an abundance of cultural relics listed under them. Please update the list, thank you. Hi (talk) 11:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Cannons (house)
[edit]Cannons (house) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for George Rogers Clark National Historical Park
[edit]George Rogers Clark National Historical Park has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 14:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Golubac Fortress
[edit]Golubac Fortress has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 17:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Chester Rows
[edit]Chester Rows has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Architecture of the medieval cathedrals of England
[edit]Architecture of the medieval cathedrals of England has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Louvre has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:47, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for National Register of Historic Places
[edit]National Register of Historic Places has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)