User talk:Stumbleannnn


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #13

Thank you

Thank you for having reverted recent changes on page Access token made by an unregistered user from Brazil (IP 177.129.209.94). Can you please also revert all changes this person made on page Social login? Thanks again! NoWikiNoLife (talk • contribs) 14:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 14:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC) (please make sure to create a new topic instead of typing on my page! Thanks! [It wouldn't let me reply by press the button.])[reply]

Thanks. That was quick! Can you tell me how to do that (revert multiple edits in one go)? I'd like to learn, so I can deal with vandalism without having to bother admins. Sorry about the way I posted, I always forget the little + button next to 'edit source' at the top of the page... NoWikiNoLife (talk • contribs) 15:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's called twinkle, you can read more about it at WP:TW! ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 15:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thanks for all this. Feel free to delete this conversation from your talk page whenever you find it appropriate. NoWikiNoLife (talk • contribs) 15:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) You can also use undo on multiple edits in a row, I figured out recently. If you go on a page history and view the diff of all the addition of vandalism, then hit undo, it undos all of it (without a default edit summary).

To get the diff of all the addition of vandalism, on a page history, use the two dots that are shown. Put the "left" dot on the last clean version, and put the "right" dot on the last edit that added the vandalism (or keep it at the top/last edit if no edits by other users have been made). Then hit "Compare selected revisions". When you're in the diff view, click the undo button.

But you already use Twinkle, so you don't really need to know this, unless someone interrupted the article before you revert the vandalism and then you don't have the Rollback button where you want it.

Sorry if I'm yapping too much nonsense

Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:45, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry! It's all good. You're not talking too much. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 01:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if you can help on my article? Grffffff (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ill look. Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 21:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more better at anti vandal than article writing but I'll see. Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 21:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CVUA

Hi there! I have prepare for you the course. It is located right here. Before starting, you should read the relevant pages, particularly WP:VAND and the like.

I see that you have multiple mishaps above, but don't worry, if you have any questions, you can always ask me or your mentor (user:CFA). Happy editing! ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Sorry I was 8 hours late.. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 18:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I edited it. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 03:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It has been a while since I posted your first task there. Just FYI. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added my explanation and I have added the revs. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ (he/they) Talk to me 07:11, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hey, I see you posted some nonsense on my talk page. May I ask why? 77.243.29.47 (talk) 00:14, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 00:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i correctly warned you, you removed stuff from the page without explaining well enough. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 00:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) 77.243.29.47 (talk) 00:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no? Also you are being hostile to me currently. I advise you to stop. Your edit summary seemed biased or not adequately explained. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 00:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed)77.243.29.47 (talk) 00:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

if you continue hostility , I may warn you again. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 00:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But for personal attacks ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 00:23, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed)77.243.29.47 (talk) 00:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

im not an admin. ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ Talk to me 00:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed)77.243.29.47 (talk) 00:31, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SPI-discussion-note

Template:SPI-discussion-note has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 03:47, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SPI-puppeteer-note

Template:SPI-puppeteer-note has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 03:50, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Stumbleannnn, you can see how that template messed up here. perhaps, {{uw-socksuspect}} could solve that crisis.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 13:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the error. Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 09:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Stumbleannnn, see the redlinks.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 10:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Τhats because the pages have been moved or the user didn't make a page. Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 10:49, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

well it's because of both of those reasons but still Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 10:50, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding templates

Typo related warning templates, that you had created are just wow. You got yourself equipped with too much template knowledge and coding. Happy Editing.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 01:04, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

i used a basic base from Template:uw-vand1 2, 3, etc, i rewrote it a bit and yeah ~≈ Stumbleannnn! ≈~ (he/they) Talk to me 06:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Doxing. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Do not WP:MOVEWAR; you must instead discuss and gain consensus prior to further moves, per WP:RMUM. Happily888 (talk) 12:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 21:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

are you accusing me of vandalism? Seems like template misuse in that case. Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 21:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read more carefully in the future. Given you have an interest in warning templates, you should read what they actually say in full, and not interpolate things they clearly do not say. Remsense ‥ 论 21:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate.

Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 21:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FUCK THE NO WIKI TAG AHHHHHHESHVSUC EH H G. GR H H GH S HD HC HH Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 21:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct: many of your edit summaries are inadequate or inappropriate. Please write better ones in the future. Remsense ‥ 论 21:26, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I USED SOURCE CODE THIS FUCKING NEW WIKI TEXT IS SHUIUTITUTIA UA GA AHVA Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 21:26, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop posting like this? It's incredibly rude. Remsense ‥ 论 21:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

. Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 21:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't feed the trolls

Please don't feed the trolls as you did here [1]. It rewards them with the attention they are craving, and encourages them to keep at it. Best just to ignore them. Thank you. _signed,Willondon (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

. Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 21:03, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page edits

Please don't use the reply tool to just sign edits without actually writing a reply, as you did here. Additionally, this is a reminder you to edit WP:CIVILly, including on talk pages and to stop swearing or WP:SHOUTING on them (see here and here). You should also see WP:EDITSUMMARY to understand its role and how to write appropriate ones, rather than this, this or this. If you continue to edit inappropriately, your account will be blocked from editing. Happily888 (talk) 23:17, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i was writing a reply. "." is basically like saying "I-" or "oh-" Stumblean! ^{Talk ☏} (he/they) 01:13, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's how I took it. _signed,Willondon (talk) 02:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then just write "I-" or "oh-" instead of just that. You also shouldn't be writing it three times, see WP:TALK#USE/WP:TPNO. Happily888 (talk) 01:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Stumbleannnn/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Stumbleannnn/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Happily888 (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]