Template talk:Cite tweet
![]() | Template:Cite tweet is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
![]() | This template is a Citation Style 1 specific-source template based on {{Cite web}}. For centralised Citation Style 1 discussions, see Help talk:Citation Style 1. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cite tweet template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months ![]() |
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2015 April 11. The result of the discussion was "no consensus to delete". |
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 7 August 2023, it was proposed that this page be moved to Template:Cite X post. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
"user" parameter is not necessary
[edit]The |user=
parameter is not necessary because we can find any tweet just from it's number. suppose whole url is https://x.com/Wikipedia/status/1843233092145701274
, now this tweet can be accessed without knowing the username like this: https://x.com/anyuser/status/1843233092145701274
. but this template always says |user
is required and without that it returns error. see here[31 number reference].––kemel49(connect)(contri) 13:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a way to determine a tweet's author from its number without following the link? Rjjiii (talk) 13:50, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Username is not necessary at all, if we omit the user parameter, it could reach to destined tweet by following the number parameter. and we can fill out author parameter only if we wish and it's not necessary that's what i mean.––kemel49(connect)(contri) 14:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Consensus is for including the author in a citation if possible (Wikipedia:Bare URLs & Why Bare URLs are a problem]). Rjjiii (talk) 22:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- This edit was done because
|user=
parameter was populated by an unexpected input. in such case, instead of using user parameter (which is necessary) url could be retrieved by usinganyuser
. This is how the mentioned edit was done.––kemel49(connect)(contri) 13:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- This edit was done because
- Consensus is for including the author in a citation if possible (Wikipedia:Bare URLs & Why Bare URLs are a problem]). Rjjiii (talk) 22:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Username is not necessary at all, if we omit the user parameter, it could reach to destined tweet by following the number parameter. and we can fill out author parameter only if we wish and it's not necessary that's what i mean.––kemel49(connect)(contri) 14:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Bluesky
[edit]Is it time to fork the template, as "Cite Bluesky"?
Post URLs take the form:
https://bsky.app/profile/pigsonthewing.org.uk/post/3lcxslny57k2s
where "pigsonthewing.org.uk" is the user-name and "3lcxslny57k2s" is the UID of the post. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: I might be a bit late here, but I totally agree. GnocchiFan (talk) 12:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
X vs. Twitter
[edit]I think that instead of saying "via Twitter", this template should say "via X (formerly Twitter)". GnocchiFan (talk) 12:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- It is line 156 in the sandbox if you want to tweak it and seek consensus to change. Rjjiii (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- If that is to be done, oughtn't the
|via=
value be chosen according to the date of the source? Before some date certain, it should be Twitter because X did not exist; X thereafter. - —Trappist the monk (talk) 16:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- If that is to be done, oughtn't the